Evike.com BAMF 190rd Polymer Mid-Cap Magazine for M4 / M16 Series Airsoft AEG Rifles (Color: Tan / Single Magazine)
258 Customer Reviews
by David H. on 01/12/2017
"Unfortunately these do not fit DYTAC AEG's. Do not buy these if you have a DYTAC rifle. They do however fit A&K rifles quite well.
by DaVid P. on 04/26/2016
"mags work great in my g&g, but i bought them for my HK 416c and the do not fit, nor do they fit my HK 416d, whitch is a vfc note
by Ryan J. on 04/08/2015
"Kinda meh mags
Pros:
Great capacity
Feed well
Have a nice baseplate to grip
Cons:
Imitation rounds are just a sticker, and a bad one at that
Plastic is very low quality, cracked just from being inserted hard and shattered when dropped from 4 feet onto concrete
If you treat your stuff extremely carefully these are for you, otherwise I'd recommend you save your money
Pros:
Great capacity
Feed well
Have a nice baseplate to grip
Cons:
Imitation rounds are just a sticker, and a bad one at that
Plastic is very low quality, cracked just from being inserted hard and shattered when dropped from 4 feet onto concrete
If you treat your stuff extremely carefully these are for you, otherwise I'd recommend you save your money
by Ramsay D. on 02/22/2015
"Do NOT be deceived by the product pictures! The "live round" decals viewable through the clear window have been changed, and the new "rounds" look very cheap, low-detail.
Mags still work, though I get the occasional feeding issue on my stock G&P Masada. RPS might be an issue, but I'm no pro. If you're buying for the looks, reconsider. If you just want an M4/M16 PMAG, you could do a lot worse.
Mags still work, though I get the occasional feeding issue on my stock G&P Masada. RPS might be an issue, but I'm no pro. If you're buying for the looks, reconsider. If you just want an M4/M16 PMAG, you could do a lot worse.
by nick n. on 01/15/2015
"Not really sure what everyone is saying. I bought 4 of these mags, these mags look much better in the pictures than they do in real life. They are a good amount wider than your standard M4 mag, so it can fit a bit tight in mag pouches. In the video, Matt says that it will fit in 416s, just not as well. This was not the case with me as I had to take a dremel to the area that would not fit. The ribs provide good grip, however I had to dremel off the very top one because it would not fit into the magwell. The base plate is a bit hard to grab on to, wouldn't imagine fitting a ranger plate, may be able to fit a Magpul over it. The polymer it's made of is a solid polymer, however the texture they gave it was terrible, feels really terrible in the hand. It's a bit long, but that's why it is 190 rounds.
On to the good things:
High Capacity
Sturdy
Works like a charm
Amazingly good price
Cons:
Looks Terrible
Feels Terrible
For me, would not fit in a 416.
On to the good things:
High Capacity
Sturdy
Works like a charm
Amazingly good price
Cons:
Looks Terrible
Feels Terrible
For me, would not fit in a 416.
by nick n. on 10/26/2014
"These mags are very good for the price point, and feeds and so far, is relatively reliable. I hate the texture of the mag though, uncomfortable, the mag is a bit wide and tall. The faux round simulation is total trash. Literally a piece of paper with fake rounds that they didn't even take the time to make look good. The video said it will fit 416s (though not as well). Wrong, I had to take a dremel to the lip of it to make it fit at all. Overall, while these mags work well (like any other mag should) I have a hard time saying these are good mags, I feel like they are cheap, and poorly made, but otherwise working. If I hadn't needed mags in a hurry and modified them, I would've returned it. But for those who don't care at all, these are the mags for you!
by brad w. on 03/17/2021
"While these mags do work they have a couple downsides. They feel cheap like they are made from a milk jug, maybe its just the texturing. They difficult to lock into place in my specna arms edge series M4, they require some wiggling to do so.
by Phi N. on 02/27/2021
"Won't fit either of my rifles that take standard m4 mags. I have both a ics g33 and an apex fast attack m4. Just to get the mag to lock in i literally hace to fumble with it and smack the heck out of it a few times on both guns. I do have a krytak that they fit in to but that gun needs internals so God knows if they even feed like they should. I'm superiorly disappointed in them tbh
by Garrett H. on 01/01/2021
"I’m just starting out and for a starter cheap price they will get the job done, but right out of the box every single one I got would double feed a lot and they all wouldn’t fire every bb. There would always be between 1-6 bb’s that didn’t fire. Sometime I would have to take out the mag and put it back in because the mag would jam. For the price I’m happy for now but I wouldn’t buy more than what you need to just start. If you have to option, I would get much nicer G&G mags like the one that came with my G&G CM18 Mod 1. These cheaper mags also have a cheaper polymer plastic body that seems to scratch and wear easily compared to the G&G mags.
by Samuel I. on 05/25/2020
"Bought 3 of these mags along with my G&G GC16 Wild-Hog.
The mags DO NOT fit inside the gun, well they do but if you pull they come right out. Which I find completely unacceptable considering the GC16 is basically a modded combat machine. The magazine bay on the gun in no different from the one you'd find on a normal combat machine so it was VERY surprising to figure out these magazines kept falling out. One fell out mid-game without me even noticing so I had to spend 10 minutes of my time looking all across the field for it.
Pros-
1.No feeding issues from what I've seen
2.VERY good build quality for the price
Cons-
DOES NOT FIT IN MY M4!!!!
BB catch at the top became loose on my 3rd mag and rendered it completely unusable.
The mags DO NOT fit inside the gun, well they do but if you pull they come right out. Which I find completely unacceptable considering the GC16 is basically a modded combat machine. The magazine bay on the gun in no different from the one you'd find on a normal combat machine so it was VERY surprising to figure out these magazines kept falling out. One fell out mid-game without me even noticing so I had to spend 10 minutes of my time looking all across the field for it.
Pros-
1.No feeding issues from what I've seen
2.VERY good build quality for the price
Cons-
DOES NOT FIT IN MY M4!!!!
BB catch at the top became loose on my 3rd mag and rendered it completely unusable.
by Jalix A. on 05/13/2020
"Bought three and only one fit properly in any of my M4s. Others take a lot of force to put in.
by Michael M. on 06/24/2016
"After breaking in these mags the most I could cram in there was about 130rd, so the 190 claim is b.s. For me the seem to feed best with about 90rounds in the mag, if I push more than that they are guaranteed to jam. Fit and finish of the mag is fine. The bullet sticker is cheesy but one screw and a can spray paint took care of that. Overall I would say I'm disappointed, and I would not buy these mags again.
by Chris H. on 07/08/2015
"Just a little info.. these mags are double stack inside. The description says 190 rounds, but this reliably holds only around 120 rounds. After that, it jams 100% of the time, I end up having to unload the mag until there are ~120 rounds. Beware "over" loading these above 120 rounds.
by Erik P. on 12/28/2022
"Tried these in four different M-4 type guns; Tokyo Marui, G&P, JG Works and one other. The magazines would not secure in any of them and would fall out.
Evike processed a return, so good for them.
Evike processed a return, so good for them.
by James C. on 02/09/2020
"Purchased 4 BAMF Mid-cap Magazines. Tested all 4 in a G&G Firehawk, all 4 would fall out after 4 or 5 rounds. Magazine would not stay in place.